five.  Realized Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel to the complainant further argued that during the investigation from the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping pills on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has actually been manufactured before the Court wherein the sleeping products were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected in the liver but not while in the abdomen. For this reason, the recovery of reported sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General as well as counsel for the complainant have also argued that during the investigation from the case the petitioner Bhoora led to the recovery of the motorcycle.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Life imprisonment can be an alternative towards the death penalty. In this sort of cases, the convicted person is sentenced to invest the remainder of their natural life at the rear of bars.

The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed from the bank and given that only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )

R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as police officials did not inform him that the identification parade of your accused has not been conducted nonetheless. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to consider advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image on the petitioner was greatly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity with the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to discover the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed shots. In addition to, the images shown within the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity until finally he was set up for an identification parade. Making photographs in the accused publically, both by showing the same towards the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or plan, would create doubt from the proceedings of the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to guarantee that there isn't any probability for your witness to begin to see the accused before going on the identification parade. The accused should not be shown towards the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Given the reasons elaborated over, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

only over the ground of miscases remanded & only on the ground of misreading of evidence only around the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

There are innumerable occasions where here death was never intended – even more where These nominated in the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is usually a tragic event. Even so the death of any living being is no much less a tragic event.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected to your death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a possible fine.

The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report to the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its possible to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity of your national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of these changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a strong legal system.

However, it’s essential to note that the application from the death penalty is matter to several legal safeguards and owing process to make certain fair trials.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination from the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]